Follow palashbiswaskl on Twitter

ArundhatiRay speaks

PalahBiswas On Unique Identity No1.mpg

Unique Identity No2

Please send the LINK to your Addresslist and send me every update, event, development,documents and FEEDBACK . just mail to palashbiswaskl@gmail.com

Website templates

Jyoti basu is dead

Dr.B.R.Ambedkar

Thursday, June 28, 2012

To Be or Not To Be By Peter G Cohen

To Be or Not To Be
By Peter G Cohen

It is time to tell the truth about nuclear weapons. They are not a deterrent to terrorists, whom security experts regard as the greatest danger to our nation. They do not deter attacks from other nations, because very few want to attack us, and our overwhelming conventional forces are more than enough for our defense.

What nuclear weapons actually do is cost us a great deal of money. Just to maintain the warheads will cost us $7.6 billion next year and $2.5 billion more to prevent proliferation. As we trim our federal budget other programs will be cut, while nuclear weapons funds are strongly defended in the name of National Security and for the benefit of senators and representatives who have facilities in their districts. Many Congress people hope to spend at least $100 billion in the next decade on "modernizing" the planes, missiles and submarines that are ready to deliver the warheads to an unidentified "enemy."

Nuclear weapons are completely indiscriminate. They incinerate adults, children and pets in the target area without regard for innocence or guilt. The radioactive fallout drifts for miles on the shifting winds. For example, Russian scientists recently concluded that the fallout from Chernobyl has killed 950,000 Europeans.  

Even a relatively small nuclear war would create so much soot that it would drift around the earth for years, blocking the sun and reducing crop yields, thus causing widespread famine. At the same time, the great heat of a nuclear fireball and the following firestorm carries radioactive materials into the stratosphere, where they weaken the ozone layer, causing blindness, skin cancer, and damaged immune systems. It would also destroy aquatic ecosystems, resulting in reduced ocean productivity for years. (for an excellent summary of these effects see: www.ippnw.org/pdf/zero-is-the-only-option.pdf )

For those who are concerned that a nation might try to cheat a Nuclear Weapons Convention, a world system of sensors is now in place. While it is almost impossible to produce a nuclear weapon without testing, this worldwide system will make any nuclear weapons test immediately known to all.

The generals and admirals, the senators and representatives, the nuclear laboratories and plants, believe that they are defending America. Their experts can calculate the megatons of explosive power in each of the weapons systems. But they do not represent the human future, or the millions who would disappear instantly in the fireball or slowly succumb to radiation disease. It is up to people of conscience  to make their voices heard. It is up to mothers and grandmothers to say that it is intolerable and criminal that more than twenty years after the end of the Cold War, Russia and the United States still have more than 3,300 warheads targeted on each other. 

To Be Or Not To Be
If we love money more than life, as some supporters of "modernizing" our nuclear weapons and facilities seem to do, then we must accept the idea that we, or our children and grandchildren, sooner or later, will be incinerated in a flash, poisoned by radioactive fallout, or starved by a nuclear winter. 

As long as we persist in having these weapons, we are investing in a worldwide holocaust that will incinerate, sterilize and starve distant people who have nothing to do with the nations involved in the war, accident, or act of nature that detonates these weapons. 

God has given us this beautiful, abundant planet and the miracle of human life. Human cleverness has provided us with the tools of worldwide suicide. Can we admit that we have gone too far? That human, mechanical or natural failures can plunge us into the final fire? That the only recourse is to overcome our fears, our dream of domination, and our attachment to the profits of death? Only then can the United States take the lead in freeing the world of these suicidal weapons.
# # #

Peter G Cohen, artist and writer, has been a student of nuclear weapons since creating materials for SANE's Ban the Bomb testing campign in the 1950s. As an activist he was a peace candidate for U.S. representative in the Lehigh Valley in 1968 and the director of the New Democrati Coalition of PA, 1969-'70. He is the author of nukefreeworld.com and other internet writings.Peter now lives in Santa Barbara,  where he can be reached at <aerie2@verizon.net>

Copyright © Peter G Cohen, 2012

[Dear Editors, I want this article distributed as widely as possible. You may use it in any newsletter or magazine wthout permission. This is a Multiple submission.
Thank you, Peter   Phone not for publication: 805.884.0704]

No comments: