Re: [PMARC] For wider dissemination

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:28 PM, kg.kannabiran <kg.kannabiran@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear freinds  Alloting the work removing animal carcasses is caste
chore no longer permitted It is an atrocity under sub section 2 of
sextion 1 of the Atrocities ActUnless you use the Act  as and when
ifractions the culture and habit of legality will not be formed. Usage
of this practice for several generations practice of this barbarity
appears nirmal to them and for the Dalits it came to be recognised as
one of ther chores. There is no point in saying the law is not having
the desired effect Unless you file complaint under the relevalt
provisions and fight them in the fora made available to even the
police will not recognise as serious matters. In the present case you
have Report which makes out a case of infringement. The boycptt is an
expression of intent to compel you to a chore which is defined as
atrocity. You have a Special and in this instace you can straight away
applies. Convert the Report into a complaint and filr it agaist the
leaders of the community .under section 10 of the Act. File a
complaint under section 10A for the imposition of a collective fine.
If Dalith lawyers ask them to get thouroughly get to know the Act .
All of you are Ambedkars legatees. He was a great lawyer You should
emulate his qualities as a lawyer. His life should inspire you to
fight like him in the courts Bring it s the notice of the state to
take up the issue as a law and orfer issue under section 17 under the
Act. Ask the Government to take effective steps to implement the Act
or if they have made formal noises of compliance ask them to function
effectively.

Unless you attempt to robustly implement the laws they will not get
into the habit of legality. Unless you assert your claim to equality
of statusculture of respecting you wwith human dignity the present
recognition that you are a subjugated lot willnot be erased  The
effort should always be erase from the minds of mentheuppercaste that
you are an inferior lot. Atrocities and assaults will not stop until
and unless you ben them to observe law. Your detemined help will help
the poor to fight oppression .

I was until recently the National President of PUCL. I demitted my
office very recently and I am a Senior Advocate based at Hyderabad AP.
I was very angry when I read the Report. with best wishes KG
Kannabiran

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 6:44 PM, subhash.gatade
<subhash.gatade@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Dear Arun
>
> I will be happy if you carry the report at the earliest. Some of our friends
> have done this fact finding and the situation on the ground seems to be
> really bad
>
> sincerely
> subhash
>
>
> SOCIAL BOYCOTT OF DALITS IN M.P.
>
> UNCIVIL SOCIETY, APATHETIC ADMINISTRATION
>
> (FACT FINDING REPORT ISSUED BY NAGRIK ADHIKAR MANCH AND YUVA SAMVAD)
>
>
> (The situation in the Gadarwara Sub Division of District.Narsinghpur (MP)
> has been in a state of constant flux since last 3-4 months. The Dalits
> living in the villages adjoining Gadarwara have been condemned to a life of
> fear and intimidation.Their human rights and dignity are being at stake.
>
> Obviously there is a concrete reason behind this sudden spurt in violence
> against them.They have refused to remain subservient to the interests of the
> upper/dominant castes and have decided to speak up.
>
> Instead of taking concrete steps to guarantee the human rights of dalits
> granted to them under constituion, the administration has preferred to
> remain silent or at best supportive of the interests of the dominant castes
> only. One can easily see why Madhya Pradesh happens to be the state which
> tops the list of atrocities on tribals and stands second when it comes to
> cases of atrocities against dalits.)
>
> Dist : Narsinghpur(Madhya Pradesh)
> Tehsil : Gadarwara
> Affected Area : Dalits (Ahirwar community) in Gadarwara and adjoining
> villages
> Villages visited by the Fact Finding Team : Nander,Madgula, Devri and
> Tekapar
> Date: 7th and 9th November 2009
>
> Members of Fact Finding Team
> Jai Bhim, Moolchand Ahirwar, Javed, Skand Shukla, Manoj, Satyam, Shivkumar,
> Nishant Kaushik
>
> Brief Introduction to Narsinghpur District.
>
> District Narsinghpur falls under the Nagpur Commissionorate. It is situated
> half-way between the capital Bhopal and Jabalpur. The economic mainstay of
> Narsinghpur is cultivation of sugarcane and pulses(dals). The population
> predominantly consists of Rajputs, Lodhi , Patels, Kirar and Ahirwar.
> Gadarwara is the main Tehsil of Narsinghpur.
> Gadarwara
>
> The Ahirwars make almost half (38,000-40,000 ) of the total population
> (70,000-80,000) of Gadarwara.Around 80-85 percent of the people in this
> tehsil are engaged in agriculture or related work. Agricultural labourers
> and landless peasants comprise a majority among them. Most of the
> agricultural labourers belong to the Dalit communities and among them the
> Ahirwars (Chamars) predominate. This caste falls under Scheduled Caste in
> the Constitution. They(Ahirwars) also form a major portion of the Scheduled
> Castes in the country and more so in the Hindi speaking area (where Chamar
> is used as a derogatory term).There are over 700 surnames in this caste.
>
> The Ahirwars are spread over Gadarwara and nearly in all the adjoining
> villages. They play a very prominant role in the socio-economic activities
> of this area.
>
> The Ahirwars Resolution giving rise to the present oppression
> Ahirwar Samaj Mahaparishad had been trying to evolve a general consensus
> since last one year about abandoning the obnoxious practice of carrying of
> the carcasses of dead beasts ; to rid them of the centuries old practice of
> being looked down upon by the varna (upper) castes as carriers of the
> carcasses and consequently untouchables. Ahirwars in many villages actually
> discontinued this practice from July-August onwards. The Ahirwar Samaj
> Mahaparishad resolved in October 2009 to abandon this practice by the
> community en masse at the state level.
>
> The social history of oppression
>
> It becomes clear from the social history of India that a sort of gradation
> based on discrimination and un-touchability has been established here. This
> practice has been fed and confirmed by other social constructions.
>
> In spite of the forceful pleading of social justice in the Constitution,
> social inequality has persisted and is a sine qua non of our society This
> division based on differences rooted in inequalities has insulted the
> self-respect of people and compounded their human rights.
>
> The roots of the exploitation and oppression of the Dalits in Gadarwara are
> in this practice. The burden of lifting carcasses of the dead animals had
> been imposed upon the Ahirwars in the course of the division of social
> labour. For centuries the inhuman work has been done by them. The surprise
> is that despite the imperative necessity of getting this work done a view of
> looking down on this work as lowly and insulting work has also been
> simultaneously developed by the society. This has remained the mainstay of
> the untouchability and oppression practised vis-a-vis the Ahirwar
> community.This despite the fact that the Constitutional provision under the
> 'Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989',
> carrying of carasses has been classified as a form of practising
> untouchability and nobody can be forced to do this work. However, the
> reality of Gadarwara is quite the opposite. It need be underlined at this
> juncture the said act which recently completed 20 years of enactment,
> carries important provisions to prevent atrocities against the Scheduled
> Castes and Scheduled tribes, which largely remain unimplemented.
>
> A Detailed Report of the Fact Finding Team and Its observations
> Despite repeated complaints against the oppression faced by the dalits at
> the hands of the dominant castes and demands for action against them the
> attitude of the administration has remained apathetic. This despite the fact
> that Dalits in 5-6 villages have filed complaints of physical harassment and
> oppression.
>
> Even at present the position is that not only had there been no let up in
> the collective harassment faced by the dalits but it has become more severe.
> We were receiving reports of the plight of the dalits and their attempts to
> resist the inhuman treatment meted out to them since last few months. Under
> the circumstances it was considered necessary that the position may be
> ascertained and verified by a Fact Finding team.
> A detailed report of the visits to four villages in the area is given below
> :
>
> VILLAGE:DEORI
>
> The Ahirwar Community at Deori is in a serious predicament. The Upper
> Castes/Non-Dalit castes have resorted to cruel tactics for harassing them.
> Since the issue of removing carcacces of dead animal has been raised by them
> they have declared a virtual blockade of the community.Taking advantage of
> the confused laying of public road No. 128, the dominant castes have created
> such a situation that the Ahirwars are not able to come out of their houses.
> The community has been 'imprisoned' in its own native village.
>
> The following facts were revealed before the Fact Finding Team
>
> I- Denial of access to daily utilities
>
> 1.There is ban on them on making any purchases from the only provision shop
> in the village.
> 2.They are not allowed to get water from a public tap.
> 3. Ban on travel by public transport
> 4.Stopping vegetable and food vendors, newspaper boys including dhobis
> (washermen), nais(barbers) from entering Dalit localities
> 5.Stopping access to flour mills for grinding corn
> 6.Ban on entering the Village Panchayat Bhavan
>
> II Atrocities on children and women.
>
> Bablu, Jagdi and Pappu belonging to Upper castes injured Devaki ,an Ahirwar
> girl, on the head .
>
> Bimla Bai was threatened by non-Dalit Devendra Kumar warning her not to step
> in their fields failing which they would strip her naked and parade her
> through the village.
>
> Yogesh Ahirwar studying in the local school told that they are served
> mid-day meals in separate plates and they had to wash the plates used by
> them.
>
> III - Intimidation by armed persons and threatening to kill
> Hari Singh and Omkar, both Ahirwars told the Fact Finding Team that they are
> being constantly threatened by Arjun, Nipal and Ghanshyam, all Gurjars
> (non-Dalit caste) to kill them. They blamed them for always
> complaint-mongering.
>
> In a meeting organised by the Village head (Sarpanch) in October 2009 to
> resolve the issue, more than hundred people belonging to non-dalit castes
> who were carrying different arms, literally pounced upon the Ahirwars and
> tried to intimidate them. The Ahirwars who had gathered there hoping for a
> peaceful and respectable solution, literally had to flee the place to save
> their lives.
>
> IV - Creating obstacles and obstructing schemes meant for the Dalits and
> other needy rural people.
>
> Attempts are being made to deprive the Ahirwar community from the benefits
> of the welfare schemes - schems run jointly by center and state governments
> - such as NREGS, Nirashrit Pension Yojana (Pension for the Shelterless),
> Indira Awas Yojna, labour welfare schemes and distribution of land for the
> landless.
>
> We learnt that job cards under NREGS of Vanshilal , Prakash, Vinod, Vishal,
> Malkham (all Ahirwars) and even of some other Ahirwars have been kept by the
> Sarpanch with him. The pension of Harkishan Singh Ahirwar aged 70 years has
> not been paid for the last four months.Similarly, Besides this the amount
> sanctioned under the Indira Awas Yojna has not been paid to Vanshilal,
> Karodi Prasad and other 12 persons.
>
> V-On the brink of starvation
>
> The landless Ahirwar peasants cultivate the land of the upper caste people
> on lease on expence sharing basis (batai). Under it all expenses right from
> bowing to harvesting is done by the person taking the land on lease and he
> is given ¼ to 1/10 portion of the harvest by the landlord However, when the
> crops bowed in June reached the harvesting stage some influential landlords
> refused to allot any share to the cultivators and in fact harvested the crop
> with Harvester Combines and took it away. The Ahirwar community which faced
> drought last season is on the brink of starvation.If the same state of
> affairs continues, it is feared that there would be starvation deaths in the
> area.
>
> VI -Economic sanctions
>
> Almost all the Ahirwar families in Deori are landless. They eke out their
> living working as sharecroppers or labourers When their resolve not to lift
> the caracces of dead animals was declared virtual economic sanctions have
> been imposed on them.The locals told the Fact Finding Team that this time
> not a single crop-sharer has been given his share. Many others have not been
> paid even their wages. They told us in details about non-giving the shares
> of the crop. Some of the names are listed below. In some of these cases the
> harvest has been cut and in other cases the cultivator has been probibited
> from even entering the field.
>
> Details of persons from Deori not receiving their share in the harvest.
> S.No. Sharecropper from Landlord/non-Dalit Area of land cultivated Harvest
> Ahirwar Community
> 1. Vanshilal Ahirwar Purushotam Agrwal 5 acres Soyabean and corn (dhan)
> 2. Vanshilal Ahirwar Devi Singh Patel 3 acres Corn
> 3. Vishal Ahirwar Dhansingh Kadkoul 4 acres Soyabin and corn
> 4. Purushottam Ahirwar Ramkumar Thapar 2 acres Corn
> 5. Purushottam Ahirwar Aman Patel 2 acres Corn
> 6. Ajaysingh Ahirwar Ekamsimngh Gujar 6 acres Soyabin and corn
> 7. Prakash Ahirwar Chander Gurjar 2 acres Corn
> 8. Gopal Ahirwar Zummak Gurjar 3 acresss Corn
> 9. Pancham Ahirwar Indrapal Gurjar 5 acres Soyabin,sugarcane,corn
> 10. Potai Ahirwar Potai Karat 10 acres Soyabin ,Corn
> 11. Nepal Ahirwar Nepal Gurjar 6 acres Corn
> 12. Malkham Ahirwar Madan Patel 3 acres Corn
>
>
> 6-Dumping dead cattle in Ahirwar locality
>
> Munna Gurjar forcibly dumped the dead animal in front of the house of
> Malkham Singh Ahirwar. Similarly dead animals are being dumped in the
> pokharee (small pond) in front of Vishal Ahirwar's the house.
>
> People hailing from influential families even dumped the dead carcass in
> front of the Community Hall. It is needless to say that othe Public works
> were affected.
>
> Depriving of the Right to Work under NREGS
>
> The NREGS work has been widely affected by this decision not to lift
> carcasses .The people from the Ahirwar community have been deprived of the
> works being done under NREGS. Their work is being got executed by employing
> other persons.
>
> Action by Administration
>
> People from Deori have complained twice to the Sub-Divisional Officer,
> (Anuvibhagiya Dandadhikari) Gadarwara but the SDM has merely consoled them
> and has not bothered to take any action against the perpetrators.The matter
> has been kept hanging till date.
>
> Village-Tekapar
>
> The condition of Tekapar is no different from other villages. Here also the
> Dalit Ahirwars have to face a virtual boycott and violence at the hands of
> the dominant castes/non-Dalit castes. Here the Dalit count for more than
> half the population of the village. Out of them a mere 13 have land in their
> name-a mere 3 acres in all. The rest all are farm labourers.
>
> In the second week of October some people from the Ahirwars were summoned by
> the caste people and they were pointblank asked whether they will or will
> not lift the caracasses of dead animals. The Ahirwars conveyed to them the
> community decision. The next day a fiat was issued by the caste people
> warning the Ahirwars that if by any chance the Ahirwars pass through their
> fields they will have to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/-
>
> The intimidation did not stop here. A strict ban was imposed on availing the
> village facilities of shop for things of daily use, use of public tap water
> system, flour mill and other public places.They used to take clay for
> building from public places but a total ban on such use was imposed.Netram
> Ahirwar infomed us that the work of digging for clay has always been a
> community effort but now they threaten us if we take clay.
>
> Sahebsingh Ahirwar informed that he is a crop-sharer in the field of a caste
> man but he has not received his share of the harvest till this date. Swaraj
> Suria (upper caste) even prohibited Aman Ahirwar to walk on the concrete
> road and in case he resisted threatened to kill him. When Netram Ahirwar
> took his farm instruments to the the local blacksmith for repairs he was
> told that there was a ban on extending any service to the Ahirwars. Mohanlal
> Ahirwar is not receiving funds for a safe delivery under the state scheme
> meant for the poorer sections of society.
>
> An oppressive condition for crop sharing
>
> Thereafter for fear of violent response in the village and bowing before the
> pressure of the dominant castes 70 year old Fullu Ahirwar had to accept
> removing a dead animal.It was only then that he and other members of the
> Ahirwar community were granted a marginal share in the crops harvested by
> them.
>
> The Community does not have the Antyodaya Yojana Card
>
> There is a big scandal in the distribution of Antyodaya cards to the
> poor.This card intended for farm labourers and poor Dalits in the village
> has been distributed to upper/dominant caste people. A large number of
> theAhirwars have been kept outside the purview of this scheme.
>
> No work in NREGS
>
> There pressure tactics also obtain in the field of the constitjutional
> rights of 100 days employment.The Dalit Ahirwars receive hardly 10 to 15
> days of work and that too with difficulty.
>
> The Reaction of the Administration
>
> The people of Tekapar have been kept under threat by the influential castes.
> They are threatened that should they dare to complain they will have to face
> the music.In spite of this the Ahirwar people had made representations
> against the injustice to them in writing to the Sub Divisional Magistrate on
> 8th October 2009. Despite this the status quo remains and no action has been
> taken to ameliorate the situation.
>
> Village-Nander
>
> People from the Dalit cimmunity of Nander told the Fact Finding Team that we
> decided to stick to the decision of the Ahirwar Community not to lift dead
> animals both in letter and spirit. The Ahirwar Community has conveyed this
> decision to all the villagers. However, the caste people in the village did
> not like this. On the 10th October 2009 the villagers carried a caracass of
> a dead animal in a bullock cart at the center of the Dalit Basti and threw
> it down in front of the house of Rameshsingh Ahirwar. Mukesh Upadhyay (a
> Upper case member) even got some earth sprinkled on the carcass through some
> people. Ramesh Singh Ahirwar requested them not to do so. On this Mukesh
> threatened to cut down the hands of anybody who dared to touch his dead
> animal. Ramesh Ahirwar told that the following day Pralhad Yadav dumped a
> dead calf at the same place. The caste people deliberately selected this
> place for dumping the carcasses to teach them a lesson . This was an
> exhibition of 'dadagiri' to break the minds of the community.
>
> That there would be serious consequences of such dumping of carcasses was a
> foregone conclusion. A 70 year old woman —Birya Bai – who lived in an
> adjoining hut was pushed towards a serious breathing trouble due to the
> obnoxious malodour of putryfing flesh. She had to be removed to the
> Gadarwara Hospital. Ramesh Ahirwar's mother Ayudhi Bai(Age 65 years) also
> suffered on the same count,. Evidently this deed was more than sufficient to
> spread pestilence in the village.
>
> In the second phase , to increase the pressure on the Ahirwar community the
> non-Dalit caste people .imposed a total ban on the Ahirwars. That meant that
> no member of the Dalit community could use any facility , not even touch,
> the properties such as the farms and fields belonging to the Upper caste and
> non-Dalit caste people. Use of ingress and ingress paths , farm compounds
> and even use of land for relieving themselves was totally banned. for them.
>
> Pohapsingh Ahirwar told the Team that the caste people are subjecting them
> to abuse, beatings and social boycott in public places like common water
> taps, schools, panchayat and flour mills. Lalji Singh says that he is
> Assistant Teacher in the school but they were forcing even me to lift the
> carcasses. They threatened me not to divulge this fact to others and allege
> that I was causing much harassment to the student and they would see him for
> that.
>
> Seventy five year old Nanhu said that the washermen and barbers have been
> discriminating against them for years. They have to attend to these works
> themselves or go to other places.
>
> One more tale of the harassment of the atrocities of the influential castes
> is Pohapsingh Ahirwar. He had purchased a land from one Takat Singh Gurjar
> and also paid an advance of fifty thousand rupees but now Vinod Rajauriya is
> refusing to get this sale deed registered.
> From the time the group decision against lifting of carcasses has been
> implemented the extension of all welfare schemes such as NREGS, Nirashrit
> Pension Yojana (Pension scheme for the Deprived people) ,Indira Awas Yojna,
> Labour Safety Scheme etc; have been totally suspended.
>
> NREGS
>
> Job Cards for all the eligible persons have been filled up but very few
> people get any work. After this incident giving any work to any member of
> the Ahirwar community has been totally banned.
>
> Administrative Inaction
>
> The villagers have represented to the SDM Gadarwara and demanded immediate
> cessation of these atrocities and a solution found for these problems. On
> this the Tehsildar just visited the Village Gram Panchayat and only advised
> the Sarpancfh Vinod Tiwari (A caste man) that nobody could be forced to lift
> an animal carcass and advised to fix one place for dumping the dead animals.
> The Sarpanch did issue orders appointing one man from the opposition group
> for this purpose.However, the formalities of fixing one single place for
> dumping the carcasses has not been completed as yet. But since then no
> further action has been taken by the Administration in this regard. This
> despite the fact that there has been an increase in the atrocities committed
> against the community since then.
>
> Village –Madgula
>
> After the Ahirwar Community's decision against lifting of animal carcasses
> and their social boycott by the caste people, the situation has worsened.
> Here the Dalit basti is situated beside the Main Road outside the village.
> The caste people have banned their entry to the village or the fields Here
> most of the agricultural land is owned by the caste people.There is no
> community lavatory or public road in the place.This has resulted in a
> virtual ban on the Ahirwars to relieve themselves.Obviously, under these
> circumstances the Ahirwars have beem forced to use the roadside to relieve
> themselves. The atrocities of the caste people have forced the people from
> the Ahirwar community to abandoning the village or even commit suicide.
>
> 1.Reduction in wages
>
> On 31st July 2009 it was declared by a public announcement that members of
> the Ahirwar Community who work as crop sharer on the lands of caste people
> would have to agree with the wage-structure approved by the landlords or
> else leave the village. The wages for other works were also reduced to half
> from the normal rate of Rs. 70-80.This is not even a living wage for the
> workers and is even against the provisions of law.
>
> 2.Ban against necessities of life
>
> There is a stringent ban on the Dalit Community against access to public
> utilities like common water tap, provision shops,flour mill etc.
>
> 3.Maltreatment of women and Threats
>
> As there is no public road in the village the people from Ahirwar Dalit
> Community are banned even from relieving themselves. Consequently the women
> from the community are compelled to use the roadsides for this purpose.Anant
> Ahirwar told that when they do not find men for harassment the caste people
> target the women.If they protest they are threatened that if they do not
> follow their orders some day they will all be hanged by trees on the
> roadside
>
> Complaints against the Atrocities
> Harrassed by such dealings of the caste people lodged complaints against
> Dileep Rajput, Rajkumar, Narendra, Inder, Gutpal and five others. On this
> the Police Officer from Saikheda visited the village and advise the
> people.to avoid conflicts.
>
> The Conclusion and The Way Out
>
> MP has always remained at the top in atrocities against the Dalits. Even
> sixty years after gaining Independence the roots of social atrocities have
> still remained deep.For centuries the inhuman work of removing carcasses of
> animals and separating the hides from them has been got done from the Dalit
> communities. Even after virulent defence of human rights in the Constitution
> of the Independent India this inhuman and unconstitutional work is being got
> done forcibly from the Dalit communities.The irony is that this year sees
> the completion of twenty years from the promulgation of the law (SC and ST
> [Prevention of Atrocities] Act 1989) against Dalit exploitation.
>
> After meeting hundreds of people from the four villages in MP the Fact
> Finding Team has observed how the Collective Decision of the Ahirwar
> Community (Dalit) of not undertaking the inhuman and unconstitutional work
> has become a question of prestige. The caste people are endeavouring for the
> reversal of this decision through social, economic sanctions.The caste
> people desire that the Dalits should abandon their struggle for self-respect
> and continue to undergo the social and cultural slavery .
>
> The Fact Finding Team observed the following phenomena during their
> observation of the Gadarwara Region
>
> - This decision of the Ahirwar Community to preserve their self respect is
> considered by the caste people as a challenge to the communal superiority.
> - By displaying their social and economic superiority the caste/non-Dalit
> castes are trying to keep the Ahirwar under constant pressure.
> - The roots of these atrocities lie in an attempt to seek approval of the
> socio-cultural dogma that this work is the duty of a specific community.
> - The Administration instead of standing by the Dalit community in support
> of their constitutional right is acting as a silent partner of the caste
> people to maintain the status quo.
>
> On the basis of its observations of the prevailing circumstances the
> Gadarwara Region the Fact Finding Team feels that the following steps need
> to be urgently taken
>
> 1.Institute an independent and impartial judicial enquiry of the things
> happening in Gadarwara Tehsil
> 2.Appropriate action against the people who are forcing the lifting the
> carcasses by some people
> 3.Immediate action against the people on the basis of the Fact Finding
> Report and and names mentioned in complaints received by government.
> 4.Take stringent steps to dispel the fear psychosis prevailing in the minds
> of the Ahirwars
> 5.The reestablishment of the participation of the Ahirwar community in the
> social welfare schemes from which it has been kept awat,
> 6.Restoration of the crop share to the Ahirwar crop-sharers deprived of
> theie legitimate dues and also paymentg of adequate compensation for the
> deprival.
> 7.Restoration of claims of those falling Below Poverty Line but have been
> deprived of the benefits .
> 8.Take abiding steps for an abiding solution of the problems.
>
> (FACT FINDING REPORT ISSUED BY NAGRIK ADHIKAR MANCH AND YUVA SAMVAD,MADHYA
> PRADESH)
> Contact Persons :
> - Jay Bhim
> Nagrik Adhikar Manch,H.No.900, Durganagar, Near WaterTank No.2, Bhopal,
> Mobile No. 09301363498
> E-mail id: nambhopal@gmail.com
> - Mool Chand
> Nagrik Adhikar Manch, Mobile 09303052704
> - Javed
> Yuva Samvad, 09424401459
> E-mail id : yuvasamvadbhopal@gmail.com
> -Manoj
> Yuva Samvad, Bhopal
> Mob : 09754762958
>
>
>
>
> Visit web site | Reply to sender | Click here to unsubscribe
> The email is intended only for the recipients. The owners of the Dgroups
> cannot be held responsible for the contents of the email message.



--
K.G. KANNABIRAN
National President, PUCL
Plot 300, Street 6, E. Marredpalli
Secunderabad 500 026, AP
Phone: 040-27730632


________________________
Visit [web site]( http://dgroups.org/groups/PMARC ) | [Reply to sender]( mailto:kg.kannabiran@gmail.com ) |
Click [here]( mailto:leave.PMARC@dgroups.org ) to unsubscribe
The email is intended only for the recipients. The owners of the Dgroups cannot be held responsible for the contents of the email message.