Saturday, January 9, 2010

Re: Israeli Firm Responsible for Amsterdam Airport Security Where Terrorist Boarded Aircraft



On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Feroze Mithiborwala <feroze.moses777@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear All, The articles & information collated below, again go to prove the role of the CIA-Mossad-MI6 in the Detroit False Flag terror. The statement by the Yemeni President Saleh that the Al Qaeda is linked to the Mossad, should have been headline news the world over but no a whimper. This has also earlier stated by the late Yasser Arafat as well.
Our friends in the US & America have figured out the 'Game Theory' deployed by the Imperialist-Zionist Intelligence agencies - I only wonder when we will be honest enough in India to do so.
In Solidarity with the Resistance
Feroze


Dear All,
 
I do not usually forward articles from the crappy Jerusalem Post, but, like Bob, after having read Jeff Gates' book, I seem more and more able to connect the dots.   In an earlier email, Jeff, who knows a thing or two about just WHO is in charge of security at airports, but also of telephone networks, etc., told me in no uncertain words that WE ARE ALL MONITORED ALL OF THE TIME.   I already knew that the main Swiss telephone exchange is "secured"  by an israeli firm.   Imagine the wealth of information on banking, etc. that can be obtained there.
 
Getting back to the "connecting the dots" in the first article below, look for the words "was purely coincidental".   (The bold is mine.)
 
What a great marketing ploy!!!   And "just in time" to boost the bottom line!!!   Some Zionist is already counting the billions to be made from the debacle of the "underwear bomber"! 
 
And if Yemen is next, how many more billions of "borrowed dollars, with high interest rates from China" can be made by the new version of Blackwater (the name reminds me of Darth Vader in those old "Star Wars" films"), since there just "ain't" enough cannonfodder left to recruit in the shopping malls and the "hoping for a green card" list?!!!    I read somewhere that Blackwater had changed its name after its hired "mercenaries" in Iraq were accused of killing innocent civilians in yet another one of those "collateral damage" scenarios.   And presto!   "Blackwater" became something like "Whitewater", and carried on with its business as usual!!    It is scandalous!   I much doubt if Nixon quite imagined "the yellow peril of China" quite like this!   I think that he referred to future demographics, but not to a future US debt to China.   Mao must be laughing in his grave.
 
All of those Americans and many other governments, whether politicians or so-called "businessmen",  who are complicit in this, should be tarred and feathered and marched in the street wearing a black letter for "TREASON", no holds barred.   It also occurred to me that they could also wear a RED LETTER,  denoting a "WHORE", like it used to be in more puritanical times for those poor souls who either made, or were thought to have made, some kind of mistake of morality.  The "Scarlet Letter", obligatory reading in my youth, comes to mind.   By today's standards, the poor things were quite innocent and did not do any harm to anyone except to their own reputations and future marriages.
 
NOW the WHORES that pledge allegiance to a foreign entity in the Middle East are governing us nearly everywhere, still as "clandestine lovers" in a "Rosemary's Baby" kind of  scenario.   In Polanski's film, poor "Rosemary" worked it out too late, gave birth to a monster, was overwhelmed by the Satanists around her, and in the end, with a mother's love and seeing a fait accompli, breastfed the monster.   See any anologies there?
 
Perhaps, for once and only this time, the crackpots fighting to "bear arms" in the streets of the US could use their arms justifiably!   Needless to say, for some, they could not care less about any foreign wars in places like EYE-RAQ, but they will be most interested in what happened to their homes, their jobs and their bank accounts, well at least for those nutcases that have not cleaned out their bank accounts getting reading for the "rapture" - flying off from an illegal settlement next to Jerusalem straight to heaven!
 
The article that follows on "JUST WHO the honest Nigerian banker who spilled the beans at the American Embassy about his son's "fundamentalism" really is,  is yet another eye opener", and it came to me courtesy of Michael Carmichael of Planetary.   More "food for fear" for the ignorant masses" ... who actually believe what they are told by the mainstream media.   That is equally as terrifying for me.   It is clearly a case of "the lights are all on, but nobody seems to be at home"!
 
The very last article was forwarded by Feroze Mithiborwala.  In it, Webster Tarpley laments why all of those in charge of security in the US got a theatrical "slap on the hand" from their very eloquent  "commander-in-chief", yet NOBODY lost their jobs!   Tarpley's comparison of this to Kennedy's "Bay of Pigs" is telling as well.
 
rosemary
 
 
 
---------------
 
Ben-Gurion Airport revolutionizes security with Unipass biometric system
Jan. 5, 2010
Yaakov Lappin , THE JERUSALEM POST

As international aviation officials look to Israel for techniques to safeguard air travel after the failed Christmas Day bombing, Ben-Gurion airport on Tuesday launched a biometric security system for outbound passengers, heralding a new era of hi-tech passenger screening.

The Unipass Airport Management System, developed by the Israel Airports Authority, is initially being tested on El Al Matmid Frequent Flyer Club members, before being gradually expanded to include, within two years, all departing passengers who voluntarily register, the IAA said.

The IAA said the timing of the biometric security program's launch, amid heightened international air travel security following the Al-Qaeda terrorist plot to blow up a US airliner over Detroit last month, was purely coincidental.

The IAA refused to address the issue of passenger profiling, saying instead that the Unipass system will offer improved service and security, and an identical screening process for all passengers.

"This is the first system of its kind in the world. Interest has been expressed by other international airports," an IAA spokeswoman said.

It was too soon say how much time the new arrangement will save, the spokeswoman added, but once it becomes fully operational, the system is expected to significantly speed up the security and check-in processes.

In the first stage, passengers will arrive at a registration desk, where a machine will scan their passports, and take fingerprint and facial imaging samples to create a biometric signature.

The information will then be stored on personal smart card that will be issued to each passenger. The registration is a one-time process. Equipped with their smart cards, passengers can then proceed to the first security stand, where they will be asked to swipe their cards and passports through the machine. As the computer confirms a biometric match, a touch screen panel will present the passengers with a series of security questions that until now were asked by airport personnel.

Guards will stand next to the stands to help anyone who runs into difficulties, the IAA said. "We¹re not giving up on human interaction," the spokeswoman said.

"If any of the questions receive incorrect answers, or the system reports a problem, passengers will be taken aside by a guard for an in-depth check, before being allowed to proceed."

The luggage X-ray machine is the next stop, and passengers will once again swipe their Unipass cards through a scanner to inform the system that they have passed the first stage of security.

After the luggage is scanned, passengers will go to the airline's check-in desk, where the smart card will again be swiped, prompting a message to appear on the clerk's computer screen that the passenger has passed through all security stages.

Once check-in is completed, the hand luggage scanning stage takes place, where travelers once again swipe their cards before continuing on to border control, the duty free stores and boarding.

The IAA already allows passengers to circumvent Border Control passport checks with a biometric fingerprint scanner, and says it plans to soon replace Border Control with the Unipass system for registered passengers.

Additionally, the IAA said passengers would soon be able to forgo sending their suitcases through the X-ray machine in the departure hall prior to checking in, thanks to a new system called Hold Baggage Screening.

"Passengers registered on the Unipass system will take their luggage directly to check-in, and from there the suitcases will be passed through comprehensive security before being loaded on the plane," the IAA spokeswoman said.

"I have no doubt that this system will significantly decrease waiting time for the various security checks," IAA director-general Kobi Mor said.

The IAA said the biometric information stored on Unipass computers would be fully secure and could not be accessed by outsiders.

 
-------------------------
 
Gordon Duff's column is written in the direct, terse and journalistic style typical of US military classrooms.  

Duff reveals new evidence about the family of Abdulmutallab.

With thanks to Shelby Tucker, author of Among Insurgents.

Print
Vader

Gordon Duff
Veterans Today
Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:24 EST


Terrorist
When nothing adds up, its time we starting looking at what we know. Our recent terrorist, now dubbed "the crotch bomber" is another dupe. He could have been working for anyone, drugged, brainwashed or simply influenced, maybe by crazy Arabs, maybe by the Mossad, maybe by the CIA. We only know the game is falling apart. 

We do know a couple of things. Dad, back in Nigeria, ran the national arms industry (DICON) in partnership with Israel, in particular, the MossadHe was in daily contact with them. They run everything in Nigeria, from arms production to counter-terrorism. Though Islamic, Muttalab was a close associate of Israel. He has been misrepresented. His "banking" is a cover. Next, what do we know about the two Al Qaeda leaders Bush had released, the ones who planned this? 

According to ABC news, the Al Qaeda leaders running the insurgency in Yemen were released from Guantanamo, although two of the highest ranking known terrorists there, without trial. 

Guantanamo prisoner #333, Muhamad Attik al-Harbi, and prisoner #372, Said Ali Shari, were sent to Saudi Arabia on Nov. 9, 2007, according to the Defense Department log of detainees who were released from American custody. 

Both of the former Guantanamo detainees are described as military commanders and appear on a January, 2009 video along with the man described as the top leader of al Qaeda in Yemen, Abu Basir Naser al-Wahishi, formerly Osama bin Laden's personal secretary.
With all the hoopla about trials in New York, not a word is said when top level terrorists are released to Saudi friends of the Bush family who let them go. We are now fighting these two Bush friends in Yemen. They are running a major insurgency there. We have been using Cruise missiles and our jets to attack their bases in the last weeks. 

CBS Learns CIA Had Advance Information on Detroit Terrorist
CBS News has learned that as early as August of 2009 the Central Intelligence Agency was picking up information on a person of interest dubbed "The Nigerian," suspected of meeting with "terrorist elements" in Yemen. 

Sources tell CBS News "The Nigerian" has now turned out to be Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab. But that connection was not made when Abudulmutallab's father went to the U.S. Embassy in Nigeria three months later, on November 19, 2009. It was then he expressed deep concerns to a CIA officer about his son's ties to extremists in Yemen, a hotbed of al Qaeda activity.
The CIA Official Statement 

CIA admits broad information during the November interview, information not acted on in any responsible way but failed to understand that the terrorist they were warned of in November was the one they had been tracking since August.
"We learned of him in November, when his father came to the U.S. embassy in Nigeria and sought help in finding him. We did not have his name before then," said Paul Gimigliano, a CIA spokesman. "Also in November, we worked with the embassy to ensure he was in the government's terrorist database - including mention of his possible extremist connections in Yemen. We also forwarded key biographical information about him to the National Counterterrorism Center.
CIA, Israel and Yemen 

It is claimed by groups claiming to be Al Qaeda in Yemen that the Detroit attack was in retaliation to US attacks on bases in Yemen run by Al Qaeda leaders released by Bush. 

The government of Yemen, as reported in the BBC , says that the Al Qaeda terrorists, led by those released by Bush, are really Israeli agents though they have organized attacks against US targets:
Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh has said the security forces have arrested a group of alleged Islamist militants linked to Israeli intelligence. Mr Saleh did not say what evidence had been found to show the group's links with Israel, a regional enemy of Yemen. The arrests were connected with an attack on the US embassy in Sanaa last month which killed at least 18 people, official sources were quoted saying. 

"A terrorist cell was arrested and will be referred to the judicial authorities for its links with the Israeli intelligence services," Mr Saleh told a gathering at al-Mukalla University in Hadramawt province. "Details of the trial will be announced later. You will hear about what goes on in the proceedings," he added. 

The 17 September attack was the second to target the US embassy since April. Militants detonated car bombs before firing rockets at the heavily fortified building. 

Mr Saleh did not identify the suspects, but official sources were quoted saying it was same cell - led by a militant called Abu al-Ghaith al-Yamani - whose arrest was announced a week after the attack.
With continual reports from Pakistan that India and Israel have been involved in terrorst attacks against US supporters there and the recent reports that the Detroit bomber was assisted by an Indian while boarding in Amsterdam and partially confirmed reports that a second bomber, an Indian, was arrested and taken from the plane in Detroit. MILive broke this story in the US which originated with Reuters:
Reuters reports Dutch military police are investigating claims that an accomplice may have helped Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab board Northwest Flight 253 in Amsterdam on Christmas day without a passport. 

Kurt Haskell of Newport, Mich., took to the comments section of this Web site early Saturday to share his story: That he and his wife, Lori, saw a well-dressed man help Abdulmutallab board the flight without a passport under the guise he was a Sudanese refugee.The military police have already said Abdulmutallab did not go through passport control at Schiphol when he arrived from Lagos.
In another interview on Inside Edition, Haskell described what happened:
A passenger has come forward with disturbing new details about the plot to bring down a jet, including the astonishing claim that the accused terrorist was able to board the plane without a passport. 

Kurt Haskell showed Inside Edition his boarding pass for Northwest flight 253 from Amsterdam to Detroit. The lawyer, who lives outside Detroit, was returning home from an African safari when he says he saw the terror suspect, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallabm, and another man, who he thought was Indian, approach the ticket agent. 

"Only the Indian man spoke," says Haskell, "And what he said was, 'This man needs to board the plane but he doesn't have a passport.' " 

"His clothes were like jeans and a t-shirt or something, he looked kind of thin, like a 16-year-old teenager, and the other man, looked like he was 50 years old, looked like he was a wealthy, Indian man. I just couldn't figure out why they were together," Haskell tells Inside Edition.
An earlier CBS news report today stated:
CBS News has learned the State Department system designed to keep track of active U.S. visas twice failed to reveal Nigerian terror suspect Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab had been issued an active visa allowing him multiple entries into the United States. 

According to a law enforcement source, the first failure came on Nov. 19, 2009, the very same day Abdulmutallab father's, Dr. Umaru Mutallab, a prominent banking official in Nigeria, expressed deep concern to officials at the U.S. Embassy in Abjua, Nigeria, that his 23-year-old son had fallen under the influence of "religious extremists" in Yemen

The second failure to flag an active visa belonging to Abdulmuttalab occurred the very next day in Washington, after Mutallab's concerns were forwarded to officials there. It was only after the Christmas Day terror attack in Detroit that U.S. officials learned that Abdulmuttalab had been issued a visa by the U.S. Embassy in London valid from June 16, 2008, through June 12, 2010. ..
Thus, in another set of coincidences, the system put in place after 9/11, meant to prevent the misuse of student visas for terrorist acts, single, Islamic engineering students tied to religious extremists being a risk factor in that area, failed totally. 

Picture the November 19 interview. A poor taxi driver comes to the US embassy: "My son, he is hanging around with a rough crowd. He says he wants to blow something up!" 

No, wait, that was someone else. Picture the November 19 interview. One of the richest people in the world, head of a major bank, cabinet minister, head of the national armaments industry, close associate of the US Ambassador and someone known around the world makes an appointment to come to the US embassy. 

He wouldn't have met a clerk. The US Ambassador himself would have arranged for the highest ranking officer in the embassy hold the interview. Mr. Muttalab would have been greeted by the ambassador when he came to the embassy. 

Mutallah meets with CIA Chief of Station in Nigeria, November 19 

We have confirmed that Mutallah met with the CIA chief of station in Nigeria

Imagine this person of great power and influence, with friends at the highest levels of the CIA and Mossad. When he came to announce his son may be a terrorist, he was a loving father asking for help? He would have made this points:
  • My son is a danger to himself and others, please keep him safe
  • Do not allow my son to travel to the United States under any imaginable circumstances as he is likely to be involved in acts of terrorism
  • Please assure me that you will act immediately and contact me as to what measures you have taken.
Were any of this true, this is what would have been said. Were any of what we have been told true, none of what we saw in Detroit could have happened. What we know is that something very different than this really happened. Go ahead and Google "muttalab, nigeria, bank, mossad, defense" 

Let's look at the Wayne Madsen report on the failures at the airport in Amsterdam along with direct ties between this case and the shoe bomber Richard Reid:
The Mutallab case also resembles that of another attempted plane bombing, that of the hapless "shoe bomber" Richard Reid. 

It has also been revealed that Mutallab is the son of Alhaji Umaru Mutallab, the former chairman of First Bank of Nigeria. According to This Day of Lagosthe elder Mutallab claims he reported the extremist views of his son to Nigerian security agencies, as well as to the U.S. embassy in Abuja, yet no attempt was made to prevent the radically-inclined Nigerian student to board the plane in Schiphol. The attempted plane bomber was schooled at the British International School in Lome, Togo and attended college in London and moved to Egypt and Dubai. The elder Mutallab is a frequent visitor to the United States and he is married to a Yemeni woman. ...
Madsen points out the well established family ties to Yemen thru his wife. He further points out how Israel managed to bring the terrorist son of Mutallab through multiple airport security obstacles with the same ease the United States shephered a known terrorist through a visa process. What we hadn't seen is how much this process had been tested during the "shoe bomber" episode.
For a number of years, passengers at Schiphol flying to the United States have been subjected to intense grilling by security personnel linked to an Israeli firm

US bound passengers at Schiphol are asked a number of personal questions, including where they have stayed either in the Netherlands or in their country of origin. Hotel receipts are routinely requested by security personnel and the addresses of private temporary residences are recorded. Mutallab boarded a KLM flight in Lagos for Schiphol where he transited for his onward flight to Detroit on Northwest/Delta. 

Six months prior to Reid's near shoe bombing of American Airlines flight 63 from Paris to Miami in December 2001, while memories of 9/11 were still fresh in everyone's mind, Reid attempted to board an El Al flight from Schiphol to Tel Aviv. 

Reid was taken aside by El Al security and identified as a terrorist suspect. Reid paid for a one-way ticket with cash and would not reveal what he planned to do in Israel. 

However, rather than turning Reid into Dutch security for further action, he was allowed to board the El Al flight by Israel's Shin Bet security so his movements during his five days in Israel could be monitored. 

Six months later, Reid attempted to ignite his shoe on the flight from Paris to Miami. Israel had not informed British, American, or any other security agency of the concerns about Reid. Reid's aunt, Claudette Lewis who raised Reid in south London, was quoted as saying she believed her nephew had been "brainwashed." 

Reid later said El Al failed to detect that he had explosives in his shoes on the flight to Tel Aviv, an amazing revelation considering the Israeli airline's tight security. 
.. 
The links between El Al security and Mossad are extremely close with abundant cross-pollination of senior personnel back and forth. 

The security company that allowed Reid to board American Airlines 63 at Charles de Gaulle airport in Paris was ICTS (International Consultants on Targeted Security) International. ICTS's senior management are all ex-Israeli security officials, many of whom for El Al security. 

It was ICTS that largely developed the passenger "profiling" procedures used at Schiphol and other airports around the world through its subsidiary, ICTS Holland Products BV.
Just the Facts 

Let's review what we know thus far:
  • Our terrorist traveled to Yemen to meet with terrorists there
  • The terrorists in Yemen had been in Guantanamo but had been ordered released by the Bush Administration though they were, perhaps, the most dangerous detainees held
  • The government of Yemen tells us that Islamic terrorists there have been arrested who have proven ties to Israeli intelligence
  • Our terrorist's father, though we are told is a retired "Nigerian banker", actually ran their defense industry in close cooperation with Israeli Intelligence (Mossad)
  • Our terrorist's visa to the US was never with withdrawn, though he was on a "terrorist watchlist"
  • Our terrorist, though flying from Nigeria, entered the Netherlands without passing through customs, something impossible to do without assistance from an intelligence agency
  • Our terrorist, while at the Amsterdam airport, was being assisted by a man appearing to be Indian, who claimed our Nigerian terrorist was a Sudanese refugee with no passport (no passport was used entering the EU, something technically impossible)
  • However, Dutch authorities, the same ones who confirmed he entered the country with no passport also confirmed he had a valid US visa, though on a terrorist watch list that is shared with Dutch authorities.
  • Airport security in Amsterdam is contracted to an Israeli controlled company with, not only the most sophisticated technologies, but, in fact, the company that had developed the concept of security profiling.
  • The parallels between this case and the Richard Reid "shoe bomber" case are much more than admitted.
Where the story is going 

We keep going back to 2007. Why were these terrorists released to Saudi custody? Why did Saudi Arabia release them soon afterward? With the 2nd major terrorist front in the world being Yemen and the terrorist operation there under the control of released Bush detainees, there is reason for suspicion. 

While we have all of these facts, easily verifiable, we have a much stronger case against the Bush Administration or Israel than Al Qaeda. There is no real evidence that Al Qaeda would be operating in Yemen without American or Saudi help and even, as stated by the Government of Yemen, direct material assistance from Israel. 

Why would such a thing be done, something against all reason unless terrorism itself was part of a larger regional plan and a "war on terror" was only a ruse. 

When Pakistan comes to us and says that Israel and India are involved in terrorism there and we ignore it, is it because it isn't credible or because the US government has been involved, as we seem to be involved in Yemen? 

Why the story has to grind to a stop or.... "The whole dirty mess will collapse" 

Why are we satisfied to take one person into custody, one person who ties to so many irregularities and ask nothing else? 

As with 9/11 and so many other seeminly impossible times when so many things go wrong that only great power and the cooperation of many agencies in many countries could make it possible, why do we ask nothing? 

We have a major investigation in Nigeria, not only of the father and his connections to Israel but our own embassy and why they left this visa alone when the individual was a known terrorist. 

How could this terrorist travel to Yemen to meet with an organization run by former detainees released by Bush and his Saudi friends, former detainees that Yemen claims are working for israel? How could he do this and be allowed to return to Nigeria, a country whose intelligence services are tied to Israel and trained by Israel? They would have known in a second. 

How did this terrorist enter the Netherlands without showing a passport? Try it. You will meet lots of Dutch people who will keep you in a small room for hours, days even. It is absolutely impossible. 

People are picked up in the EU while in passport control for non-payment of child support. I am being told they can't find a terrorist? 

We haven't begun to discover how he got past security equipment and screening. It isn't like he isn't the highest profile potential terrorist who has entered Nigeria in decades. He is Islamic, young and traveling alone. Ask any young Islamic traveler how many times they have been searched. 

He is on a terrorist watchlist. This is like the "no fly list" on steroids. You aren't just denied flight, you are put under immediate surveillance. 

If he had shown his passport, it would have shown him entering Yemen, a known terrorist training ground. This would have stopped him also. 

With the Bush administration releasing terrorist leaders and shepherding them back into their former profession, with our embassy, State Department, Homeland Security and every other organization we spent so many billions of dollars to "coordinate" all failing, is there, just perhaps, a minor sign of conspiracy? 

I would call President Obama to account for failures to discover what appears to be a conspiracy of his predecessor but, as the GOP blogs that fill the internet are working overtime to obscure the facts and place the blame on Obama alone, there could be no greater proof of non-involvement. 

Frankly, if the Obama administration was involved with Bush, as it seems they are, then the Bush/Cheney "disinformation" attack dogs would be leashed. They are not. Thus, Bush and Cheney should be targeted for investigation. 

Veterans Today Senior Editor Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran and regular contributor on policial and social issues.


--
Michael Carmichael
Planetary/USA
1818 Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard
Suite 111
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514
USA

www.planetarymovement.org
-----------------------------------------
 
 
Forwarded message ----------
From: Kevin Barrett <kbarrett@merr.com>
Date: Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:35 AM
Subject: new Tarpley: OBAMA FLUBS HIS FIRST BAY OF PIGS MOMENT AS TERROR MOLES ESCAPE PURGE
To: Kevin Barrett <
kbarrett@merr.com>


[I'll be discussing this topic tomorrow, on two radio shows: The Power Hour with Joyce Riley, 8 - 9 a.m. Central, http://www.thepowerhour.com ;  and Rabble Rousing with Chamba Lane, KVMR radio, Nevada City, California, http://www.kvmr.org/programs/rr/index.html .]
-Kevin Barrett, http://www.truthjihad.com


OBAMA FLUBS HIS FIRST BAY OF PIGS MOMENT AS TERROR MOLES ESCAPE PURGE

By Webster G. Tarpley

Washington DC , January 5, 2010 -- Obama's speech this afternoon was an incongruous performance.  On the one hand, he angrily detailed a catastrophic breakdown in US intelligence procedures leading to the near-massacre of hundreds of airline passengers in the skies over Detroit on Christmas Day.  On the other hand, there was no purge of the corrupt, complicit, and incompetent officials who had made this incident possible.  No firings were announced.  No heads rolled.  The rogue network or invisible government of treasonous and subversive moles inside the US government which is behind the Detroit incident, and so many other incidents, remained untouched once again.

WOLFFE ON MSNBC: "COCK-UP OR CONSPIRACY" ?

The expectation that Obama might actually do something to combat the rogue network across US government institutions which inflicts terrorism on the American people and the world had been raised the night before in an interview by Washington journalist Richard Wolffe on Keith Olbermann's MSNBC Countdown program. Wolffe, citing high-level White House officials, had reported that there was an investigation into whether the security lapses leading to the Detroit Christmas incident had been intentional and deliberate, and thus the products of conscious sabotage. Wolffe had stated: "It seems that the president is leaning very much towards thinking this was a systemic failure by individuals who maybe had an alternative agenda….The question there is again, cock up or conspiracy. Was there a reason these agencies were at war with each other that prevented that intelligence from being shared?" (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#34694889) The goal, summarized Olbermann, was either a "turf war" or else the desire "to make somebody [Obama] look bad." In reality, the goals involve a domestic police state and foreign geopolitical adventures.

Wolffe's report had suggested that at least some firings were in the offing for officials responsible for the failure to stop Umar Farouk Mutallab from boarding his flight from Amsterdam to Detroit , despite the cascade of red flags associated with this particular patsy.  But in his speech, Obama did not lay a glove on the invisible government forces which stage false flag terror incidents to manipulate public opinion and politics in the direction of increased totalitarianism at home and aggression abroad. Obama talked about what he would not tolerate, and about accountability in the abstract, but did not provide any concrete retribution to make moles think twice about future actions.  Even David Gergen, the former White House official who faithfully represents the oligarchical point of view, told Wolf Blitzer on CNN that he considered it virtually inconceivable for Obama to make such a speech without firing some failed officials.

THE BAY OF PIGS , 1961 – A DISTANT MIRROR FOR OBAMA

Obama's situation offers certain parallels to the experience of John F. Kennedy in the Bay of Pigs invasion of April 1961.  Upon entering office, Kennedy had been convinced by Allen Dulles and Richard Bissell of the CIA to support an invasion of Cuba , which the CIA promised would lead immediately to an insurrection throughout the island and thus to the overthrow of Fidel Castro.  Instead, the invasion was a catastrophic failure and humiliation for the United States and for Kennedy personally. When Kennedy came into office, he had been inclined to work closely with operatives like Allen Dulles and Bissell, who personified the rogue network in its then-current form.  Helped along -- according to some accounts -- by General Douglas MacArthur, Kennedy realized that the geopolitical forces behind and above the presidency which were seeking to use him for their own ends were also more than willing to ruin him politically and to cast him aside as an expendable puppet at the first opportunity.  Over time, this led to Kennedy's deep and abiding mistrust of the rogue elements dominating the Pentagon, the CIA, the FBI, and other elements of the US government -- a mistrust which allowed Kennedy to resist the lunatic proposals for general war advanced by the rogue elements during the Cuban missile crisis. In the short run, Kennedy's Bay of Pigs experience impelled him to fire Allen Dulles, Richard Bissell, and CIA deputy director Charles Cabell within less than a year after the failed invasion. Obama needs to imitate Kennedy's response, on the fast track.

Today, the breakdown crisis of the Anglo-American world system is far more acute than anything Kennedy had to face. Obama needs to muster something more than mere impotent rage about what is happening to himself.  If Obama wants to avoid the disastrous outcomes for himself and the country which are now clearly delineated, he will need to mount an ambitious purge of subversive and treasonous moles inside the federal bureaucracy, along with the incompetents, time servers, and bunglers who are happy to play along with the rogues.

WHO OBAMA SHOULD FIRE

Almost any of the twenty-odd officials who attended Obama's special meeting in the White House today could be candidates for ouster for reasons of incompetence or worse. One obvious choice would be Michael E. Leiter, the head of the National Counter-Terrorism Center , which has the responsibility of integrating all the information from 16 agencies which was so obviously not integrated in the Mutallab case. Another might be Leiter's boss Dennis C. Blair, the Director of National Intelligence or intelligence czar created after 9/11. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano is widely discredited, and has lost the confidence of the American people through her interviews if nothing else. Napolitano is also the keeper of the no-fly list, on which Mutallab needed to be listed, but was not. Hillary Clinton's State Department failed to revoke Mutallab's US entry visa after the Nigerian's father warned the US Embassy in Nigeria about his son's visit to Yemen  -- an outrageous lapse, or a deliberate sabotage. Leon Panetta's CIA also had that information, and failed to make sure it was acted on. Gen. James Jones, the head of the National Security Council, is responsible for the overall coordination of the government, which in this case was substandard. FBI Director Robert Muller's agents are up to their usual tricks of suppressing evidence in regard to the "well-dressed Indian" and the "man in orange" on the Detroit flight reported by an eyewitness, the Detroit attorney Kurt Haskell. (See http://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/index.ssf/2009/12/flight_253_passenger_kurt_hask.html) Firing any of these failed or complicit officials would be a good start.

If Obama continues to punt on real accountability, the rogue network will conclude that he is indeed the weakling and pushover which French President Sarkozy and others have suspected him to be. In that case, the handwriting will be on the wall for new world catastrophes.
 






----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: Israeli Firm Responsible for Amsterdam Airport Security Where Terrorist Boarded Aircraft

Angie, I've read numerous reports that the Zios have insinuated themselves in communications grids, security networks, etc., etc., all over the world.  One report recently centered on South Africa, where Zio/Mossad agents were screening and inordinately harassing/delaying passengers on international flights.  Canada's communications system, I saw via diagram in Jeff Gates' book "Guilt By Association," is deeply compromised by the Zios; I'm sure the U.S. is in the same fix...surely Europe and Australia follow this pattern.  Re Logan, 2001, I offer these sites for your perusal, as I admit to mere scanning of their contents which I consider provocative and in comport with other reports I've read over the years:
 
 
http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=logan_airport .  At this site, I found this quote:  "Argenbright, the company in charge of security at all the airports used by the 9/11 hijackers, had virtually no security check on any of their employees, and even hired criminals and illegal immigrants. Security appears to have particularly abysmal at Boston's Logan Airport, even after 9/11."  I searched for Argenbright, and that traced back to Securicor, and then to another security firm, so I gave up.
 
Now, I just read today briefly that ZioIsrael firm(s) are scrambling to get in big time on the "full body image" scam for air-travel "security," with Zio Chertoff (former head, Dept. of Homeland Security under Bush and the zionzazineocons) has a commercial client which is salivating over the influence that Chertoff -- that guy with the penetratingly dead-like eyes -- can bring to bear on their behalf in the same newly lucrative industry.
----- Original Message -----
From: Angie Tibbs
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 11:30 PM
Subject: Israeli Firm Responsible for Amsterdam Airport Security Where Terrorist Boarded Aircraft

 
Bob, this is frightening.  I wasn't aware that security in many European airports is handled by Israeli security firms.  Hell, this explains an awful lot about airports and alleged terrorists and removing the rights of passengers.  Things are becoming clearer as we speak.  Does anyone know who was in charge of security at Logan airport in 2001?  I'd like to know.
 
Best to all,
Angie



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 270.14.127/2603 - Release Date: 01/06/10 07:35:00





--
Palash Biswas
Pl Read:
http://nandigramunited-banga.blogspot.com/

No comments:

Post a Comment